Biodiversity Management Policy in Indonesia
N Duadji 1 , N Tresiana 1, D Purba 2 , A. Juliana 3 , FR Wulandari 4 , SA Zenitha 5 , ,A Budiati 6 , D Kurniasih 7 , GP Djausal 8 , R Sanjaya 9

1 Departemen of Public Administration, Faculty Social and Politic, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
2 Departemen of Government Studies, Faculty Social and Politic, University of Lampung, Indonesia
3 Departemen of Business Administration, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
4 Departemen of Public Administration, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
5 Department of pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Indoneisa
6 Departemen of Public Administration, Faculty Social and Politic, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
7 Departemen of Public Administration, Faculty Social and Politic, Universitas Soedirman, Indonesia
8 Departemen of Business Administration, Faculty Social and Politic, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia
9 Magister of Administration Science, Faculty Social and Politic, University of Lampung, Indonesia

Abstract

The study examines policies for managing biodiversity in Indonesia from 1990-2020. The study uses evaluation research, especially regulatory impact analysis (RIA) with a qualitative approach. The research object examines 11 legalized regulatory documents and various relevant government commitment actions. The analysis process uses the RIA technique which includes analysis of strategic problems in biodiversity management and regulatory analysis through comparison of policy content with issues of public interest, including climate change mitigation, welfare, empowerment, intergovernmental relations and others. The results: 1) the issue of damage and reduction of biodiversity in Indonesia is high- 2) The government^s support for resource protection is relatively lacking, contradictory to the biodiversity in Indonesia which is the largest and richest in the world- 3) Management failure due to minimal community involvement, weak understanding of values, management strategies and models that only focus on conservation areas- lack of consistency and weak coordination. The study contributes to improving the quality of regulations, namely in the context of policy revisions, public costs can be minimized- and on the content side of regulatory revisions, it can suppress lost resources, protect the environment from damage and mitigate climate change

Keywords: Policy quality, biodiversity governance, problem analysis, regulatory mapping, climate change

Topic: Topik B: Community partnership for biodiversity conservation